TETRA: Say no to an unsafe technologyfind out more information about TETRA

Reply to Dr David Neasham, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Imperial College London

 

See also my previous exchange.

To: Dr David Neasham
Date: 8 May 2004

Many thanks David, that is most helpful.

I am particularly glad that the police monitoring has extended to all officers, not just the 100,000 in the original Home Office statement. I still maintain that this is an unethical way of finding out how safe new equipment is. There isn't much in the way of new foods, drugs or technology that can be introduced this way these days, and is hardly precautionary.

I guess the difference between your studies and those at King's College is that theirs is experimental, whilst yours is monitoring (ie the experiment is effectively being provided for you, not by you).

Thank you for also confirming again that there is no research into health and TETRA base stations.

I have already participated in Professor Fox's study at Essex, and can confirm that again, none of this relates to TETRA.

I do agree, we need to get to the bottom of this issue through proper, open and independent research.

yours

Andy Davidson

back back
 

write!

 

Home    National    TETRA    Science    Links    Localities    Campaign    Contact us